A Regional Cycle Node Network

Guest contributor Jan Jakob Bornheim has been thinking beyond Christchurch…

The Christchurch Major Cycle Ways are a success in moving people riding their bicycles around Christchurch. But in the last few years, it seems there has been another, quieter evolution in cycling in Canterbury: the genesis of a regional cycling network in the Greater Christchurch region.

In a few years’ time, with the completion of the shared path along the Christchurch Northern Corridor, the missing link for the Little River Trail as part of the Southern Motorway works, and the Coastal Pathway, it will be possible to bike between Rangiora to Little River and from Rolleston to Sumner on cycle-friendly facilities.

This regional cycle network does not only benefit commuters (realistically speaking, on an e-bike one could commute from Kaiapoi to the CBD soon). A few years down the line, it should be possible to go all the way to Picton and connect with trails in the Hurunui along the way. The benefits of this should not be under-estimated: the national cycleway has benefited communities along it immensely.

Canterbury regional cycling – filling in the pieces of the puzzle… (click to enlarge)

Such a boom is possible for businesses in Canterbury as well. I recently had family come over from Europe, and they enjoyed the West Coast, the Alps, and taking the train and ferry to Wellington. But one of the highlights of their visit was a simple bike ride along the Papanui Parallel, the QE2 shared path along the Travis Wetland, and the Te Ara Ōtākaro Avon River Trail, finishing with a nice afternoon pint at Pomeroy’s (come to think of it, three out of four times I go to this particular place, it is because it is at the CBD end of the river trail and the perfect end-point for a casual Sunday afternoon cycle ride).

Topographically, riding your bike in the Canterbury Plains is just like riding your bike in the Netherlands, except the scenery is more spectacular. But it doesn’t only attract international tourists. A regional cycle network attracts domestic tourists and creates incentives for day tours by Cantabrians exploring their region by bike.

But looking at a map, it is not always straightforward for the interested recreational rider to see how, for example, taking the Passchendaele Memorial Path, the Northern Corridor, the Papanui Parallel, the City Promenade, the Little River Trail, and the Lincoln-Rolleston shared path all will connect with each other to make a continuous journey from Rangiora to Rolleston on a bicycle possible. A regular commuter will know their way, but the weekend tourer might not.

A node and directions to other nodes in Belgium (picture by Paul Hermans, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1797725)

This is where the idea of a regional cycle node network comes into play. These systems exist for example in the Netherlands, Belgium and the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia. In such a system, every crossing point between different cycling routes (i.e. each node) is assigned a number. The nodes are signed, and at the nodes and along the routes, signs indicate which next node can be reached by following the cycle facility in this direction. Cyclists can then easily plan a route by connecting the nodes.

The connection between the nodes – cycle paths, shared paths, or cycle-friendly roads with or without cycle lanes – are shown on a map and where necessary and practicable, signs are erected along the connectors as reassurance signs to reassure people riding their bikes that they are on a connector and which node they are moving towards. The node network works particularly well to plan a route on the computer (see for example the Limburg node network), and some route planners allow you to export a planned tour as a GPX file for use with any smartphone or other navigation system (for example, the North-Rhine Westphalian cycle travel planner).

Planning a route along the nodes (numbers in red circles) in North Rhine-Westphalia on http://radservice.radroutenplaner.nrw.de/rrp/nrw/cgi?lang=DE

But it doesn’t have to be that technical. A person wanting to travel from Rangiora to Rolleston along a certain route would simply need to write down the numbers of the nodes along the way and then follow the signposts.

In such a system, every point where major cycle ways or other cycle facilities meet would become a node. But the node network system does not require the connection between nodes to be a dedicated cycling facility. For example, the network in the German region of Viersen (PDF) clearly shows that a number of cycle-friendly roads have been marked as node connectors. The same could be done in our neck of the woods to signpost people who are riding through Kaiapoi in order to connect from the trails in the Waimakariri District to the new shared path on the bridge and the CNC shared path, or to close the gap between Halswell and Prebbleton (with the new speed limits, Sabys Road will be a cycle-friendly connection between Halswell and Prebbleton).

Ideally, a website that shows people the node network would be colour-coded to show the different types of cycling facilities (cycle path, shared path, cycle-friendly road with or without cycle lanes, unpaved trail) that act as connectors between the nodes. The investment required is not huge. A website and some information material promoting the network, clear signs along the way to signpost the connectors between the nodes as well as the nodes themselves, and maybe some paint on the cycle-friendly roads alerting other traffic participants about the presence of cyclists. It would also require a degree of co-ordination between the different road authorities. In return, I am looking forward to spending my money along the way on sustenance.

What do you think? Is a regional cycling node system worth exploring?

8 thoughts on “A Regional Cycle Node Network”

  1. I think providing only node numbers as seems to be the case in the photo restricts the information to those with internet access and know where to find the information. When I am in a car I don’t rely on the state highway numbers to work out where I’m going. The signs telling me which to go also have way more information than only the state highway number.

    Using a connected network on the ground shouldn’t require the use of apps or preplanning. Good signage is vital.

    I don’t think the Inland Scenic Route should be called a safe cycle route between Rangiora and Winchester/Temuka. I can’t even work out which road is being used between Geraldine and Temuka. That route has many single lane bridges, blind corners and hills. Rakaia River causes issues which ever way you approach it. While there are stretches of SH1 where there is plenty of space to add an off road cycleway I don’t see much point without the Rakaia link being added.

    On a positive note I look forward to seeing the rest of the new cycleway between Rolleston and Templeton along Jones Road completed. The small section that has been completed looks great but doesn’t yet link to anything.

    1. Point taken about the signs. There are other examples (e.g. the North Rhine-Westphalian design http://odenthal-altenberg.de/fileadmin/_processed_/7/e/csm_knotenpunktsystem_def09ff300.jpg) where the signs include both the name of the nearest destination as well as the node (and sometimes, as seen in the picture, also the names of trails of which they form part). I personally like the design where the node numbers are part of the main sign rather than add-ons, which is why I picked the photo that appears in the article but the destination name can easily form part. In my experience using a node network, pre-planning isn’t necessary to use it if you take a map with you or there are maps along the road that include the nodes.

    2. Sorry, and one more comment. I think a certain amount of pre-planning might be inevitable. If I want to go from Halswell to Kairaki (which is almost possible on the current network and will be in a short while), it would be odd to find signage for Kairaki in Halswell. The problem is that it is the nature of a network that not all possible destinations can be signed everywhere. Of course, if I know my way around I can make it up as I go along and think “follow the signs to the CBD, then go to Papanui, then at some point branch off the parallel on to the CNC to Kaiapoi, then go through the town to hit up with the Pegasus Beach trail” (in which case I would have missed the Nor’west Arc alternative that will be build soon). But I could also pre-plan my route and just memorise three or four numbers, or look at a map that would ideally be located at least at the nodes themselves to memorise the nodes.

    3. The numbered node system predates broad internet access and still provides paper maps:
      Important nodes may include their own public maps to help direct people on the smaller details at towns. One thing overlooked in many other countries is making the route continuous, it needs clear direction at every junction of paths/roads to guide people between the main nodes without getting lost part way there.

  2. Holy crap. What a great idea – it just makes sense.
    Hopefully the Christchurch cycling community can get together and lobby the big-powers-that-be to adopt this system – perhaps even offering an unofficial map online or at cycle stores.
    This is what Melbourne needs for it’s sprawling, but confusing to navigate cycleways!

  3. Just a heads up that consultation is now open for a shared path linking the end of the Northern Corridor pathway and the Passchendaele Memorial Path, enabling a dedicated connection on cycling facilities from the CBD all the way to Rangiora. Except for Trafalgar Street, the bane of my existence. I will mention my node idea in my feedback. https://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/north-canterbury/114466680/cycleway-plan-could-link-waimakariri-and-christchurch

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *