Flashback Friday: The 1000-Day Challenge

When we think about how long it is taking to deliver the much promised convention centre, multi-use arena/stadium, and metro sports centre (to say nothing of inner-city housing), getting things done here in a three-year timeframe seems almost laughable. And yet, post-quake there was a lot of optimism that simple low-cost measures could be rolled out fairly quickly in this makeshift “rebuild city”. That was the thinking behind the “1000-day challenge”, first mooted back in Nov 2012, to quickly improve cycling in Christchurch even before the Major Cycle Routes programme became a reality. The “1000-day” idea never got officially picked up, but it is interesting to ponder what has happened on the ground to date, and what could still be quickly rolled out…

The draft Transport Plan for central Christchurch has attracted a lot of comment both positive and negative about its impact on cycling. Now the Council’s Chch Transport Strategic Plan has just been finalised too, setting a city-wide 30-year vision for transport in Christchurch that also appears quite cycle-friendly. Probably one of the biggest concerns is how quickly (and how well) the rhetoric will turn into reality on the ground.

Chch Transport Vision – how do we get to here?

Spokes Canterbury, in commenting optimistically on CERA’s draft Plan, called for the city’s agencies to “develop a ‘1000-day Cycling Plan‘ that will see tangible and innovative changes in cycling provision and an increase in numbers within 3 years.” So what might such a Cycling Plan look like?

Firstly, why 1000 days? Well, the original CERA plan had a convenient 100-day time-limit and the transport component has taken another 100 days. However, you won’t get much physically built in 100 days, whereas in 1000 days (just under 3 years) you could expect to make some significant progress. There are some notable examples of dramatic changes happening in such short time frames, such as Seville, Spain (6000 bike trips up to 50,000 in 3 years after constructing 70km of bike tracks and other cycle-friendly initiatives) and Montreal, Canada (35% growth in numbers over 2 years following separated cycleways and bike-share scheme).

If we take the end of next March as our baseline (remembering that the final CERA Plan won’t actually be finalised until after February next year) then 1000 days would take you until the end of 2015. That’s a full 2½ years into the next Council Long-Term Plan (2013-22), the expenditure for which is currently being planned for. Although the CERA plan is only for the central city, it is sensible to consider city-wide initiatives because the two plans will feed off each other – to get cycle numbers in town you also need better cycling in the ‘burbs too.

So what could you easily do in 1000 days?

Ilam Road – just do it…
  • Introduce 30km/h speed limits in all existing traffic-calmed neighbourhoods around the city (e.g. Addington, Papanui, Riccarton clusters), suburban shopping streets (like they’ve done in Wellington) and downtown.
Seriously, why are streets like this not already 30km/h?[
  • Install cycle route signage to show people the existing cycle-friendly routes we already have. There’s already some promising examples of this along the new southern motorway cycleway:
Some useful walk/cycle destination signage alongside the Southern Motorway
  • For the transitional city we keep hearing about: install lots of “PPP Infrastructure” – not the kind that Government is currently keen on, but “paint, planters, posts” to help provide separation for cycling quickly and easily (actually “parking” is another useful separator too). They were pretty quick to remove cycle lanes when they wanted to last year; I’m sure it’s just as quick to add them. More permanent facilities can come later after the layout details have been fine-tuned and their success demonstrated.
Some examples of “PPP Infrastructure” from around the world
  • Install more bike parking; get more (good quality) racks in at the key destination spots (town, shopping areas, recreation).
A "Bike Corral" from Portland, Oregon - a much more efficient form of customer parking (c/ Bike Portland)
A “Bike Corral” from Portland – a much more efficient form of customer parking (c/ Bike Portland)
  • Implement a “quick wins” programme like that currently in Auckland, where anyone can suggest improvements to little pinch-points or missing links that make cycling just that little bit harder. Provide a relatively small pot of money to tackle the easy ones, e.g. remove barrier posts on alleyways, add missing kerb ramps, build little sections of new/widened pathway, new intersection cycle markings where there’s already the space for it, remove one badly located carpark, fix a storm grate or service cover, and so on.
So, other than annoying people, what exactly is the point of things like this?
Hmm, what to build first?
A guided ride around town…

Perhaps you can think of other relatively easy ways to get some runs on the board.

How many of these “1000-day Plan” initiatives have come to fruition so far?

2 thoughts on “Flashback Friday: The 1000-Day Challenge”

  1. The council/NZTA/ECan needs to provide single occupant vehicle counts correlated with fatality/serious injury statistics for each mode so we can measure their ability to deliver on their promises.

    Where a fatality or a serious injury occurs, there needs to be a visual reminder to those who pass.

    Have been reading the LTCCPs for decades, and the more recent Urban Development Strategies. The outcomes speak for themselves.

    Our transport network providers are not fit for purpose. Nothing has changed. Same old, same old. We can see the results on our roads every day. They need to be held accountable and subjective meaningless language needs to be replaced by objectivity.

    Also note the LTSA is now allowing scrolling screens near intersections. Has there been any research about the effects.

  2. “posts” is a joke. I remember the posts being installed on North Parade, on the inside of curves.

    The front one was broken off that day, and all the others were gone within a fortnight. That was perhaps 5 years ago, and they never got reinstated.

    Posts don’t do anything. Big concrete planters on the other hand, will be much more noticeable and harder to ignore.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.