Flashback Friday: Another look at Auckland: Shared Paths

Another week, another out-of-town trip limiting my spare hours… This time, the work topic vexing my mind is shared paths (or not shared paths). We’ve touched on the question before and it’s an area of evolving best practice in New Zealand. Is it something that can be resolved using behavioural markings? Certainly it’s one option that has recently been trialled nationally but prior to that, we can go back to Apr 2016 for a post about this interesting trial in Auckland…

I talked a few weeks ago about the latest cycling developments up in the City of Sails, aka Auckland. One more issue that they are still grappling with, particularly as cycle numbers boom up there, is the heavy use of shared pathways for walking, cycling and any other “active travellers”. Many existing shared pathways were not built to a high standard (often essentially a re-purposed footpath), which might have been fine when there were few people cycling around the city, but now the growing demand is creating problems.

Shared paths like Auckland’s Northwestern Cycleway might be fine at times like this, but are not that wide for peak hour usage
Pedestrians keep left

The long-term fix in many cases will be to go back and either widen the existing pathway or provide separate facilities. In the meantime, Auckland Transport is engaging in a promotional campaign to encourage more consistent and courteous path behaviours by those walking and cycling.

A key tool is the use of shared path “pictograms” right on the path surface itself. Different ones target different users with different messages. For example, pedestrians are encouraged to keep to the left of the path (thus making it easier for faster-moving users to anticipate their movements and move safely past them). Similarly, cyclists are encouraged to ring their bells, so that others are aware that they are approaching.

Cyclists ring your bell

Now I certainly have no problem with the messages being promoted; as we discussed recently, bicycle bells can be a useful device in the right circumstances. And it is very helpful to encourage a series of consistent path rules, like keeping left. I do wonder though whether the pictograms used here are just a bit too abstract for people to really get the message. Certainly it took me a while to work out what they were on about. You might have noticed too that in the photo above, the conventional path markings implied that pedestrians coming towards you should be on the right

I suspect that shared pathways will be a major battleground around the country in coming years if cycling numbers continue to grow. Even if planners get new path facilities right, that still leaves a huge stock of existing shared pathways that are clearly inadequate even for current numbers. Already there have been grumblings elsewhere, and even a bit of a flurry of letters in The Press lately about it too (the recent debate about dogs near shared paths in Chch also highlighted another potential wrinkle). In the meantime, a bit of patience and tolerance would probably go a long way…

What do you think of Auckland’s shared path pictograms? Would they work in Chch?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.