<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Return to Chch: We cross Live now to our Papanui/St Albans correspondent	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cyclingchristchurch.co.nz/2015/07/28/return-to-chch-we-cross-live-now-to-our-papanuist-albans-correspondent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cyclingchristchurch.co.nz/2015/07/28/return-to-chch-we-cross-live-now-to-our-papanuist-albans-correspondent/</link>
	<description>Regular people riding bicycles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2018 00:29:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LennyBoy		</title>
		<link>https://cyclingchristchurch.co.nz/2015/07/28/return-to-chch-we-cross-live-now-to-our-papanuist-albans-correspondent/#comment-1336</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LennyBoy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyclingchristchurch.co.nz/?p=7633#comment-1336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://cyclingchristchurch.co.nz/2015/07/28/return-to-chch-we-cross-live-now-to-our-papanuist-albans-correspondent/#comment-1335&quot;&gt;rob5chch6&lt;/a&gt;.

If you look at the CCC construction plans, there is an unsealed driveway running parallel to the pathway at the north end that provides access to a couple of properties (actually technically it&#039;s still part of Grassmere St there). I suppose if pathway demand really got high you might see some path users taking advantage of the extra capacity there; formal improvement by Council would be another matter again I guess.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://cyclingchristchurch.co.nz/2015/07/28/return-to-chch-we-cross-live-now-to-our-papanuist-albans-correspondent/#comment-1335">rob5chch6</a>.</p>
<p>If you look at the CCC construction plans, there is an unsealed driveway running parallel to the pathway at the north end that provides access to a couple of properties (actually technically it&#8217;s still part of Grassmere St there). I suppose if pathway demand really got high you might see some path users taking advantage of the extra capacity there; formal improvement by Council would be another matter again I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rob5chch6		</title>
		<link>https://cyclingchristchurch.co.nz/2015/07/28/return-to-chch-we-cross-live-now-to-our-papanuist-albans-correspondent/#comment-1335</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rob5chch6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyclingchristchurch.co.nz/?p=7633#comment-1335</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Joy . The land to the left of the excavator I would expect to be privately owned. The strip of land purchased by CCC for this route was several years prior to the Major Cycleway project evolving at a time when high spec  requiremants other than &#039; a path &#039; of some description would have been considered. There may well be areas of the 550m section wide enough for a dual pathway but I guess for consistency and budgeting the shared path option was favoured. The land to the east route will eventually become part of the Crandford Basin water run off management plan for the area , as part of the Northern Arterial Extension on the east side of Cranford Street.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joy . The land to the left of the excavator I would expect to be privately owned. The strip of land purchased by CCC for this route was several years prior to the Major Cycleway project evolving at a time when high spec  requiremants other than &#8216; a path &#8216; of some description would have been considered. There may well be areas of the 550m section wide enough for a dual pathway but I guess for consistency and budgeting the shared path option was favoured. The land to the east route will eventually become part of the Crandford Basin water run off management plan for the area , as part of the Northern Arterial Extension on the east side of Cranford Street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joy		</title>
		<link>https://cyclingchristchurch.co.nz/2015/07/28/return-to-chch-we-cross-live-now-to-our-papanuist-albans-correspondent/#comment-1334</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2015 22:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyclingchristchurch.co.nz/?p=7633#comment-1334</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know the area at all well but can you verify that the large area the excavator is on is to be landscaped as in the second photo. It seems like there is enough space for non-shared paths to have been put in otherwise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know the area at all well but can you verify that the large area the excavator is on is to be landscaped as in the second photo. It seems like there is enough space for non-shared paths to have been put in otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Meerkat		</title>
		<link>https://cyclingchristchurch.co.nz/2015/07/28/return-to-chch-we-cross-live-now-to-our-papanuist-albans-correspondent/#comment-1333</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meerkat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 06:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyclingchristchurch.co.nz/?p=7633#comment-1333</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent update, thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent update, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
