No problem Jessica. In some cases, it might be better to cite the original sources referred to.

Hi @Lennyboy,

Am I able to use some of this data for a project on promotion of cycling in CHCH if I cite you and cyclingchristchurch.co.nz?

Thanks

Vehicle operating cost savings are considered for motorists who are now less affected by congestion (i.e. less stop-start driving). But I don’t think I can see any reduction in VOC for those who make the mode switch; it’s a fair point. Perhaps it could be argued that it at least matches any increase in travel time, although the model seems to suggest that total travel time for cycling also decreases (hence the “Users” benefits). So, like so many aspects in the analysis, it is conservative in regards to the likely benefits – always useful when finance professors try to pick holes in it…

People on bicycles can also frequent a local business on their route as stopping and parking are so much easier.

With about 40% of our rates going to roading and about 70% of that just for maintenance the reduced wear and tear from people choosing bicycle over car will help ratepayers.

Finally, many cities have found that they do not need to build hugely expensive roading projects for cars when more people choose to bicycle. Those who think cycle infrastructure is expensive are forgetting the far higher cost of building infrastructure for motorised vehicles.